Limitations of mind maps
Convenient as they are in many cases, mindmaps have two key drawbacks that limit them for some use cases. On the one hand, mind mapping does not allow cross-connections: While the tree structure allows for a simple hierarchical arrangement of content, cross-connections, which are often necessary, are difficult to map in mind maps without quickly appearing chaotic. On the other hand, no extensive, really large maps are possible: Those who use mind maps intensively, especially with software, quickly have to deal with sizes for which the method is not designed. With numerous ramifications, the pleasant nature of the tree-like overview is usually lost.
If you do not have a problem with both, you are well served with the common mind map tools. However, those who like to create large maps or deal with interconnected issues should consider switching to an alternative.
Infinity Maps vs. mind map
Infinity Maps is based on the iMapping method, which is related to mind mapping. Both mapping methods share at their core the visual representation of information. However, the equally hierarchical visualization of the mind map and an Infinity Map is achieved differently: The basic principle of Infinity Maps are Cards, which contain the content, and which are nested within each other. Unlike branching, this novel concept provides an overview at all times, no matter how interconnected or large the map is to become. Cross-connections are represented by arrows between the Cards. Since there are no branches, the arrows do not visually compete with them. Due to the nesting principle, Infinity Maps can grow to any size. The zoom function allows you to work fluidly in depth, opening up more and more space for further details.
Kommentare